a division of Mindsprings(India) Pvt. Ltd.
Legal Services, Legal Services India, Law Firm, India, Land Disputes, Property Disputes, Rent Disputes,Real Estate, Property, Divorce, Adoption PayPal - The safer, easier way to pay online!
Sign In  
Forgot Password?
Register New User
Email
Password
Legal Services, Legal Services India, Law Firm, India, Land Disputes, Property Disputes, Rent Disputes,Real Estate, Property, Divorce, Adoption
 
Legal Services, Legal Services India, Law Firm, India, Land Disputes, Property Disputes, Rent Disputes,Real Estate, Property, Divorce, Adoption
Legal Services, Legal Services India, Law Firm, India, Land Disputes, Property Disputes, Rent Disputes,Real Estate, Property, Divorce, Adoption
Legal Services, Legal Services India, Law Firm, India, Land Disputes, Property Disputes, Rent Disputes,Real Estate, Property, Divorce, Adoption

JUDICIAL REVIEW

Ordinarily the right to move the court for judicial redressal, is available only to those whose legal right has been infringed. This rule results in the denial of justice to those, who because of their poverty or socially disadvantageous position, are unable to approach the Court themselves for relief. To overcome this problem the Supreme Court pioneered the concept of Public Interest Litigation, which permits litigation by "public spirited persons" for the enforcement of rights of any other person. In some cases Courts have taken suo moto cognizance of "news" published in newspapers and treated them as petitions. Even at times mere letters addressed to the Court have been treated as writ petitions in cases of gross violation of fundamental rights.

The protagonists of conservative legal process have not been happy with this trend and have given it the name "Judicial Activism". Impliedly one of the important aspects of "judicial activism" is the intervention of the Courts, on their own (suo moto), in any issue involving the violation of legal or fundamental rights. This aspect refers to cases, where although no petition has been filed in the Court, but still the Court steps into the matter so as to prevent miscarriage of justice.

The landmark issue of the Best Bakery Case has once again highlighted the issue of "judicial activism". This issue relates to the carnage of minorities in 2001, in Gujarat. Zahira Sheikh, the only eye witness of the event, was forced to withdraw her statement due to political pressure and intimidation. The lower Court in Gujarat released all the 21 convicts of the case. But the Supreme Court suo moto dismissed the orders of the Gujarat High Court and ordered fresh trials of the case outside Gujarat, in Mumbai. This step was taken by the Supreme Court at the request of a NGO named as "Citizens for Justice and Peace", which helped Zahira Sheikh to resurface and give her statement. So through its intervention, the Indian Courts have proved that judiciary is quite sensitive to miscarriage of justice.

You can send us your query now on query@nrilegalservices.com or click on Send a Query.

 

Home   |   Disclaimer   |   Send a Query   |   Articles   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us

Copyright ©2003-2009 NriLegalServices. All Rights Reserved. Site Designed and Developed by Mindsprings(India) Pvt. Ltd.